<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Samantha Garner - Freelance Virtual Manuscript Editor &#187; samantha</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skgarner.com/author/samantha/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skgarner.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:38:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Anyway/any way and everyday/every day</title>
		<link>http://skgarner.com/2012/anyway-any-way-and-everyday-every-day/</link>
		<comments>http://skgarner.com/2012/anyway-any-way-and-everyday-every-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>samantha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spelling & Grammar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skgarner.com/?p=128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The four words &#8220;anyway,&#8221; &#8220;any way,&#8221; &#8220;everyday&#8221; and &#8220;every day&#8221; illustrate for me just how precise and seemingly random the English language can be. It&#8217;s not always easy to tell which usage is correct. Specifically, getting &#8220;everyday&#8221; and &#8220;every day&#8221; mixed up is so common, I bet many people don&#8217;t even realize they mean two [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The four words &#8220;anyway,&#8221; &#8220;any way,&#8221; &#8220;everyday&#8221; and &#8220;every day&#8221; illustrate for me just how precise and seemingly random the English language can be. It&#8217;s not always easy to tell which usage is correct. Specifically, getting &#8220;everyday&#8221; and &#8220;every day&#8221; mixed up is so common, I bet many people don&#8217;t even realize they mean two entirely different things.</p>
<p>So, how can you tell which one to use?</p>
<h3>When to use <em>anyway</em> and when to use <em>any way</em></h3>
<p>The word &#8220;anyway&#8221; has a few meanings. They are: to redirect a conversation, to show that something is bound to happen, or to confirm something that&#8217;s previously been said. Here are examples of each.</p>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;So, anyway, what do you want for lunch?&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;If I make a turkey sandwich, you&#8217;re just going to ask for ham anyway.&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;Lunch will be turkey anyway; I don&#8217;t know why you&#8217;re asking.&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<p>By contrast, &#8220;any way&#8221; has one very specific meaning: one or many methods of reaching a certain goal.</p>
<p>&#8220;Is there any way we could have lunch earlier?&#8221;</p>
<h3>When to use <em>everyday</em> and when to use <em>every day</em></h3>
<p>As I mentioned earlier, mixing up these two is very common; probably more common than the <em>anyway/any way</em> mixup. But fear not &#8211; it&#8217;s easy to remember the difference between &#8220;everyday&#8221; and &#8220;every day.&#8221;</p>
<p>The adjective &#8220;everyday&#8221; refers to things that are routine, that are faced daily. For example, if you take the same bus to work daily, that&#8217;s your everyday route. It can also refer to things that are commonplace &#8211; &#8220;This isn&#8217;t my everyday pair of shoes.&#8221;</p>
<p>The adverb &#8220;every day&#8221; means, specifically, each day.</p>
<p>So, to say, &#8220;I eat cereal every day&#8221; is correct, because you&#8217;re explaining that you eat cereal each day &#8211; whereas &#8220;I eat cereal everyday&#8221; is incorrect. However, saying, &#8220;This is my everyday cereal&#8221; is the correct usage of &#8220;everyday.&#8221;</p>
<p><em>Posted in<a href="http://skgarner.com/category/spelling-grammar/"> Spelling &amp; Grammar</a>, <a href="http://skgarner.com/category/language/">Language</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skgarner.com/2012/anyway-any-way-and-everyday-every-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Should/could have&#8221; vs &#8220;should/could of&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://skgarner.com/2012/shouldcould-have-vs-shouldcould-of/</link>
		<comments>http://skgarner.com/2012/shouldcould-have-vs-shouldcould-of/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 16:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>samantha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spelling & Grammar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skgarner.com/?p=146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One thing that fascinates me, though the result often frustrates me, is how many of our spelling errors arise from the spoken word. The phrases &#8220;should of&#8221; and &#8220;could of&#8221; are perfect examples of this. Why &#8220;should of&#8221; and &#8220;could of&#8221; are incorrect &#8220;Should of&#8221; and &#8220;could of&#8221;, if you break them out into their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that fascinates me, though the result often frustrates me, is how many of our spelling errors arise from the spoken word. The phrases &#8220;should of&#8221; and &#8220;could of&#8221; are perfect examples of this.</p>
<h3>Why &#8220;should of&#8221; and &#8220;could of&#8221; are incorrect</h3>
<p>&#8220;Should of&#8221; and &#8220;could of&#8221;, if you break them out into their two separate words, don&#8217;t actually make any sense together. You can say &#8220;a pint <strong>of</strong> beer&#8221; or &#8220;three hours <strong>of</strong> sleep&#8221;, but &#8220;should <strong>of</strong> studied&#8221; doesn&#8217;t fit.</p>
<p>In this case, people say &#8220;should of&#8221; and &#8220;could of&#8221; because of the contraction that&#8217;s created from the word &#8220;have.&#8221; Really, it&#8217;s &#8220;<em>should&#8217;ve</em>&#8221; and &#8220;<em>could&#8217;ve</em>&#8221; &#8211; in other words, &#8220;should have&#8221; and &#8220;could have.&#8221; This contraction sounds very similar to &#8220;of&#8221; when spoken aloud, but &#8220;of&#8221; in this case is meaningless and incorrect.</p>
<p>Hope that helps!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>Posted in<a href="http://skgarner.com/category/spelling-grammar/"> Spelling &amp; Grammar</a>, <a href="http://skgarner.com/category/language/">Language</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skgarner.com/2012/shouldcould-have-vs-shouldcould-of/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Conscious&#8221; vs &#8220;conscience&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://skgarner.com/2011/conscious-vs-conscience/</link>
		<comments>http://skgarner.com/2011/conscious-vs-conscience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>samantha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spelling & Grammar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skgarner.com/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a spelling misunderstanding I’ve been seeing around the internet quite often lately. These two words sound similar, but they’re different. Here’s the difference between “conscious” and “conscience” Conscious means to be awake, to be aware, or to have knowledge of something. Conscience is the little voice inside you that tells you stealing your best friend’s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a spelling misunderstanding I’ve been seeing around the internet quite often lately. These two words sound similar, but they’re different.</p>
<h3>Here’s the difference between “conscious” and “conscience”</h3>
<ul>
<li><em>Conscious</em> means to be awake, to be aware, or to have knowledge of something.</li>
<li><em>Conscience</em> is the little voice inside you that tells you stealing your best friend’s car and driving it into a lake is wrong.</li>
</ul>
<p>So, this means the following phrases are <em>incorrect</em>:</p>
<ul>
<li>Socially conscience</li>
<li>Unconscience</li>
<li>Listen to your conscious</li>
</ul>
<h3>How to tell the difference between “conscious” and “conscience”</h3>
<p>Because these words sound so similar, it’s easy to get them confused. However, the key to telling them apart is in the second ‘n’ in <em>conscience.</em> Say it aloud if you need to (if you’re in public, you can say it under your breath – it’s okay!). If you need to talk about how to tell the difference between right and wrong, watch for that second ‘n.’ Unfortunately, I haven’t been able to come up with an easy mnemonic device for this one, but after a while it should become second nature!</p>
<p><em>Posted in<a href="http://skgarner.com/category/spelling-grammar/"> Spelling &amp; Grammar</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skgarner.com/2011/conscious-vs-conscience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What phrases really bug you?</title>
		<link>http://skgarner.com/2010/what-phrases-really-bug-you/</link>
		<comments>http://skgarner.com/2010/what-phrases-really-bug-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>samantha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skgarner.com/?p=91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know that the English language is ever evolving (though I try in my own way to keep it from evolving into incoherency), but there are some popular phrases that just make my skin crawl. I hereby vow to never use these in any form, written or spoken: Across the pond Pout – to describe [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that the English language is ever evolving (though I try in my own way to keep it from evolving into incoherency), but there are some popular phrases that just make my skin crawl. I hereby vow to never use these in any form, written or spoken:</p>
<ul>
<li>Across the pond</li>
<li>Pout – to describe lips in general, not an actual pout</li>
<li>Wow factor</li>
<li>Culture vulture</li>
</ul>
<p>Here are words and phrases that bug me because they’re actually incorrect:</p>
<ul>
<li>All intensive purposes (should be “intents and purposes”)</li>
<li>“Incidences” to mean “incidents” (“incidence” is actually a technical word which is not pluralized)</li>
<li>“Awe” as an alternate spelling of “aw” (I mean, it’s an entirely different word!).</li>
<li>“Comprised of”, but <a title="How to use the word &quot;comprise&quot;" href="http://languagestyle.suite101.com/article.cfm/how_to_use_the_word_comprise" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">I’ve talked about that one before</a>.</li>
<li>“Should of”, “would of”, etc.</li>
<li>“Penultimate” to mean “the most ultimate” (it actually means “next to last” – very far from the way it’s commonly used, which is a shame because it’s a great word).</li>
<li>“Reoccuring”</li>
</ul>
<p><em>Posted in <a href="http://skgarner.com/category/language/">Language</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skgarner.com/2010/what-phrases-really-bug-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Won&#8217;t&#8221; vs &#8220;wont&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://skgarner.com/2010/wont-vs-wont/</link>
		<comments>http://skgarner.com/2010/wont-vs-wont/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>samantha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spelling & Grammar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skgarner.com/?p=94</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently noticed that someone had arrived at my site through a Google search for “grammar of ‘i am won’t.’” It took me a minute or two to understand that the question really was about the word wont. So, in case you ever come back this way, Mystery Googler, here is your answer: What is the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>I recently noticed that someone had arrived at my site through a Google search for “grammar of ‘i am won’t.’” It took me a minute or two to understand that the question really was about the word <em>wont</em>. So, in case you ever come back this way, Mystery Googler, here is your answer:</p>
<h3>What is the difference between <em>wont</em> and <em>won’t</em>?</h3>
<p>The word <em>wont</em> talks about someone in the habit of doing something, or of a characteristic of something. To use it in a couple of sentences:</p>
<p>“Samantha was wont to think about spelling too much.”<br />
“Tomorrow will be quiet, as Sundays are wont to be.”</p>
<p>The word <em>won’t</em>, as I bet you already know, is a contraction meaning <em>will not.</em></p>
<p>So, this one’s easy. It’s really a spelling thing, since speaking the two words aloud will tell you right away if you’re saying the wrong one – and if you’re saying <em>wont</em>, people might mishear you and think you’re saying <em>want</em>, depending on your accent. This adds a bit more excitement to life! Actually, the pronunciation might help you determine which one you want to write out. <em>Wont</em> sounds like <em>want</em>, and you wouldn’t spell <em>want</em> with an apostrophe, like <em>won’t!</em></p>
<p>Oh wow. Was I getting carried away there or what? Sorry, spelling tends to do that to me.</p>
<div><em>Posted in<a href="http://skgarner.com/category/spelling-grammar/"> Spelling &amp; Grammar</a>.</em></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skgarner.com/2010/wont-vs-wont/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can you use &#8220;which&#8221; to signify an afterthought?</title>
		<link>http://skgarner.com/2009/can-you-use-which-to-signify-an-afterthought/</link>
		<comments>http://skgarner.com/2009/can-you-use-which-to-signify-an-afterthought/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 18:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>samantha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spelling & Grammar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skgarner.com/?p=96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I’m reading this novel right now. It’s good, but it uses the word “which” in a way that really bugs me. This spelling &#38; grammar pet peeve has been a fairly recent, but intense, one of mine for the past couple of years. Dear editor of novel: The word “which” is not a synonym [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I’m reading this novel right now. It’s good, but it uses the word “which” in a way that really bugs me. This spelling &amp; grammar pet peeve has been a fairly recent, but intense, one of mine for the past couple of years.</p>
<p>Dear editor of novel: The word “which” is not a synonym for “and,” “anyway” or even a period. Here is an example from the book:</p>
<blockquote><p>“And if you tell him you saw me smoking, I will banish you to the lowest circle of hell. Which I’ve never been there, but . . .”</p></blockquote>
<p>Now I’m not going to get all academic on you here (I couldn’t even if I wanted to, anyway), but “which” is a pronoun. That means it refers directly to something that’s been mentioned in a conversation, or refers to the people having the conversation.</p>
<p>The character in the example I used should say either, <em>” . . . the lowest circle of hell, which I’ve never been to, but . . .”</em> or drop it altogether. If he says <em>which</em> in the way I just suggested, he’s referring directly to the lowest circle of hell. In the way that appears the book, he’s using it to refer to, “I’ve never been there” – a future, entirely new point – which is redundant and makes no sense at all. He’s using <em>which</em> to indicate an afterthought, in which case a, “come to think of it” at the beginning or “anyway” at the end of the thought would suffice. Actually, in this example, dropping it altogether would make the most sense.</p>
<p>I know the example I used is from a character speaking, but that doesn’t make it right! Using <em>which</em> to signify an afterthought or make a new point isn’t a regionalism as far as I know, so it gets no pass from me. No sir!</p>
<p>I hope the above made sense. The thing with me is I usually feel it when a word is used wrong or a sentence is composed badly, but I can’t often put it into words. A loud clanging bell goes off somewhere in my torso. I think it’s my mutant superpower.</p>
<p><em>Posted in<a href="http://skgarner.com/category/spelling-grammar/"> Spelling &amp; Grammar</a>, <a href="http://skgarner.com/category/language/">Language</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skgarner.com/2009/can-you-use-which-to-signify-an-afterthought/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The nuttiness of the English language</title>
		<link>http://skgarner.com/2008/the-nuttiness-of-the-english-language/</link>
		<comments>http://skgarner.com/2008/the-nuttiness-of-the-english-language/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>samantha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skgarner.com/?p=99</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[English is a notoriously difficult language to learn. My parents are Finnish and Filipino, respectively, and while I don’t speak either of those languages, I can read them aloud near-perfectly. This is because, compared to English, they are easy! There are no silent letters and each letter is pronounced only one way. It’s a dream. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>English is a notoriously difficult language to learn. My parents are Finnish and Filipino, respectively, and while I don’t speak either of those languages, I can read them aloud near-perfectly. This is because, compared to English, they are easy! There are no silent letters and each letter is pronounced only one way. It’s a dream.</p>
<p>English, on the other hand. Yikes. I think I love it so much because it’s so impossible and weird. Case in point: <a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/video/0003-ibeforee.htm" rel="noreferrer">the video on this page my husband showed me</a> which demonstrates how the I Before E “rule” should, by rights, take 40 seconds to recite.</p>
<p><em>Posted in <a href="http://skgarner.com/category/language/">Language</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skgarner.com/2008/the-nuttiness-of-the-english-language/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to use &#8220;begs the question&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://skgarner.com/2008/how-to-use-begs-the-question/</link>
		<comments>http://skgarner.com/2008/how-to-use-begs-the-question/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 19:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>samantha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spelling & Grammar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skgarner.com/?p=101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This one isn’t actually a pet peeve of mine, but my husband’s. However, I think it’s an interesting one so I’m sharing it today. Before I met my husband, I thought, like many others, that “begging the question” was the same as “raising the question” – like, “It’s Donut Friday, which begs the question – [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one isn’t actually a pet peeve of mine, but my husband’s. However, I think it’s an interesting one so I’m sharing it today.</p>
<p>Before I met my husband, I thought, like many others, that “begging the question” was the same as “raising the question” – like, “It’s Donut Friday, which begs the question – why am I not eating a donut right now?” It turned out, that’s totally incorrect.</p>
<p>“Begging the question” is actually a logical fallacy. Sounds complicated, but basically, begging the question is a statement that assumes its conclusion is proven correct without any evidence. Like this:</p>
<p>“If donuts weren’t delicious, then everyone wouldn’t eat them.”</p>
<p>In this sentence, the assumption is being made that its conclusion – everyone eats donuts – is true, without any proof of that. Just stating something doesn’t make it true. It’s also using that assumption as evidence that donuts are delicious. For these reasons, this sentence is begging the question.</p>
<p><em>Posted in<a href="http://skgarner.com/category/spelling-grammar/"> Spelling &amp; Grammar</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skgarner.com/2008/how-to-use-begs-the-question/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

